Lowe’s will be presenting their proposed Guest Street project before
the BAIA this Thursday night (March 4th) at the Elks Lodge # 2199, 326
Washington St., Brighton at 7 p.m

I’m already double booked for the night, so give’m hell.  Although I’m usually pro-empty-building-development I think Lowe’s is a poor choice for that location.  That area of Market St is almost impassable on Saturday or Sunday via motor vehicle.  A trip to Brighton Center from North Allston would require a helicopter if this gets approved.

The New Balance plan sounds much better if they can get buy in from the owners of the land.  A collaspe of the Lowe’s deal - again - should hopefully speed up counter offers.

A local Lowe’s would be nice though.  It just needs to be in a lot already served by a 4 lane road…

Ty Hanlan
Director, NB Guest Street Associates, LLC
20 Guest St. Suite 100
Brighton MA, 02135
Tel: 617-987-2521
ty.hanlan@nbguest.com
www.nbguest.com”

Charlesview apartments approved

Boston Business Journal - by Mary Moore

The Boston Zoning Commission on Thursday approved a mixed-income development proposed by nonprofit builder The Community Builders and Charlesview Inc., the governing board of the Charlesview Apartments.

The new Charlesview Residences in Allston will includee 240 rental units and 100 owned units.

full story

Also mild kudos to Harvard for coming up with creatives uses for an empty VW dealership… time to go to Play It Again sports for some cheap skates since its BYO-skates.

Also also don’t forget to vote Tuesday.

Interesting debate:

http://www.yelp.com/topic/allston-brown-v-coakley

Phase 1. Buy and empty buildings

Phase 2. [Silence]

Phase 3. Urban utopia

One scary long term option whether intentional or unintentional is that Lower Allston and Brighton are being prepped for West End style urban renewal. After many years of fighting and trying to better their neighborhood will some number of residents “vote with their feet” on Harvard’s work in Allston and move to more rat free homes in the surrounding area - Oak Square, Watertown Square/Arsenal, Waltham’s Moody St?  With the community shattered and “blighted” who would stop or object to eminent domain land grabs to enlarge Harvard’s treks of land?

Brief history of the West End snipped from Wikipedia(2):

“By the 1950s, Boston’s West End had turned into a working-poor residential area with scattered businesses with small meandering roads much like the North End. According to most residents, the West End was a good place to live at this time.[3] The once overcrowded neighborhood was in the process of “deslumming”[6] and the population had dropped to around 7,500 residents.[7] By the end of the 1950s, over half of the neighborhood would be completely leveled to be replaced with residential high rises as part of a large scale urban renewal project.”

“[Mayor] Hynes wanted to return prosperity to Boston…As part of a plan to create a “New Boston”, the BRA redeveloped neighborhoods throughout the 1950s…Scollay Square was leveled to create…Government Center…The motivation behind these projects was to replace neighborhoods that had been classified as slums…”

“The plan involved completely leveling a 46-acre (190,000 m2) portion of the West End, displacing 2,700 families to make way for 5 residential high rise complexes that would contain only 477 apartments.[4] The new development was aimed towards upper middle class residents: most of those displaced would not be able to afford to return.”

Scary stuff.  Now don’t get me wrong I like the sound of Phase 3. urban utopia.  Who doesn’t want North Allston to be the “next Harvard Square” with thriving small businesses, good mass transit options and green spaces?  The problem is Phase 1 and Phase 2 shouldn’t completely destroy our neighborhood to get to Phase 3.

(1) “South Park’s” Investing Lesson http://www.fool.com/news/foth/2001/foth011108.htm

(2) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/West_End,_Boston

http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2009/12/9/harvard-allston-brighton-harvards/

http://allston02134.blogspot.com/2009/12/my-op-ed-in-todays-harvard-crimson.html

Or maybe this means the new barrels are working? They have to be braver to find food?

And on a mildly different topic Coakley and Brown came out on top. Which one will talk about Harvard and Allston?

Primary - December 8, 2009

There was even some talk of Allston in the debates:
http://allston02134.blogspot.com/2009/11/paglica-has-momentum-to-move-allston.html

Rubber Stamp the Democrat (General Election) - January 19, 2010

…or vote for a third party (or second party in Massachusetts):

http://joekennedyforsenate.com/